Upgrades and Downgrades: Where Most Reporting Goes Wrong - Issue 272
Making sense of customer movements: Upgrades, Downgrades, and Re-Subscribers
Welcome to the Data Analysis Journal, a weekly newsletter about data science and analytics.
Today, I am continuing my deep dive on customer movements - how to measure and report customer upgrades and downgrades.
A few weeks ago, I introduced the concept of re-subscribers in Re-Subscribers: Are Your Customers Coming Back?, where we covered:
Re-subscribers are customers who previously paid, churned, and later came back to pay again (e.g., they started a new paid subscription).
They are one of the strongest signals to measure how well your product delivers, whether the pricing is justified, and whether there’s room to increase it.
Yet, most analytics tools get them wrong: they either misclassify them as new subscriptions, expansion revenue, or worse, grace-period recoveries.
There are many types of re-subscribers, but only one group truly matters: those who left and returned by choice. This group is the clearest indicator of long-term product value and growth potential.
I shared my SQL approach to correctly identify and segment true re-subscribers - the kind who churned and came back by choice, not due to billing edge cases or else.
Re-subscribers often get bucketed with upgrades and downgrades - and that’s where most analysts get it wrong. They treat winbacks as either expansion or contraction, when in reality, they’re neither. As a result, 99% of winback reporting out there overestimates how many returning customers the team is actually bringing back.
In your reporting, you need to separate re-subscribers from customers who upgraded or downgraded. Below, I’ll walk you through how to do that - how to make your winback reporting accurate and how to properly segment all types of returners.
A recap: why re-subscribers are important
It's much harder to retain users than it is to convince them to make a purchase.
But bringing users back after they’ve canceled a subscription is even harder.
Once someone has tried your product, there’s not much marketing can do to win them back - if the product didn’t deliver on its promise. Or if it did, but not in the way the user expected. Or maybe it wasn’t worth the price.
So, the % re-subscribers from your total active customers or paid MAU is the clearest indicator of seasonality, value recognition, and product stickiness. They voluntarily paid again [at the same price?], for something they already used.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Data Analysis Journal to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.


