Why it’s wrong to run A/B test for too long - Issue 213
The risks of extending the A/B test timeline or why duration matters.
I’ve talked a lot about why you shouldn’t stop A/B tests early and what the caveats are to disregarding the test significance.
However, one topic I haven't yet addressed in my newsletter is why it's also wrong to run an A/B test for too long.
In other words:
if the test proved the hypothesis and
the winner is truly making a difference and
the observed lift didn’t occur by chance,
Why does it matter if the test runs for 2 weeks or 6 months? If the winner is indeed true, shouldn't the longer timeline confirm it?
Not quite. Let's dive into this topic today.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Data Analysis Journal to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

